Fidelity
The content in this document is grounded in an extensive body of research and professional practice. The guidelines, frameworks, expectations, and action steps presented here were developed by Tony Frontier, drawing on peer-reviewed research, his published books and articles, and direct application of principles and action steps implemented in schools and districts. Every recommendation reflects a deliberate effort to remain faithful to what research says about effective leadership, teaching, and learning.
Explainability
Readers who want to understand the research, rationale, and premises that underlie this document are encouraged to consult the guidance and introductory sections included here, as well as works by the author — including Teaching with Clarity (Frontier, 2021, ASCD), AI with Intention: Principles and Action Steps for Teachers and School Leaders (Frontier, 2025, ASCD), and various other articles and reports by the author. The author takes full responsibility for the positions, recommendations, and language in the framework and the examples in this document. When using this document to guide your work, examples must be tailored to fit your specific, local needs and you must engage in independent review of federal, state, & local statutes to ensure compliance as you build your boundaries & guidelines for staff, teacher, and students use.
Alabama State Department of Education. (June 2024). AI Policy Template for Local Education Agencies.
Alaska Department of Education & Early Development. (2025). Alaska K12 AI Framework.
California Department of Education. (2025). AI Guidance for California K-12 Schools.
Frontier, T. (2021). Teaching with Clarity: How to Prioritize & Do Less So Your Students Understand More. ASCD.
Frontier, T. (2023). Taking a Transformative Approach to AI. Educational Leadership 80 (9).
Frontier, T. (2025). AI with Intention: Principles and Action Steps for Teachers and School Leaders. ASCD.
Frontier, T. (2026). An Intentional Systems Level Approach to AI Use. ASCD Inservice Blog.
Hamilton School District, Sussex, WI. (2025). Artificial Intelligence Tool Usage Continuum and Ethical Guidelines.
Hattie, J. (2023). Visible Learning: The Sequel: A Synthesis of Over 2,100 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement. Routledge.
Howard County Public School System (HCPSS). (2026). HCPSS Staff & Student AI Guide: Using Generative AI Responsibly.
Lee, V.R., Pope, D., Miles, S., and Zárate, R.C. (2024). Cheating in the age of generative AI: A high school survey study of cheating behaviors before and after the release of ChatGPT. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence 7 (2024).
Oregon Department of Education. (March 2025). Developing Policy and Protocols for the Use of Generative AI in K-12 Classrooms.
Pewaukee School District. (Draft). Generative AI in the Pewaukee School District: Guidelines and Expectations for Students and Staff.
State of Hawaii Department of Education. (May 2024). Artificial Intelligence Guidance for Employees.
University of Richmond. GenAI Guidelines for Students. genai.richmond.edu/guidelines/students/
U.S. Copyright Office. (March 2025). Policy on Works Containing AI-Generated Material.
U.S. Department of Education. (January 2024). National Educational Technology Plan (NETP): The Three Digital Divides.
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology. (October 2024). Empowering Education Leaders: A Toolkit for Safe, Ethical, and Equitable AI Integration.
Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by Design (Expanded 2nd ed.). ASCD.
World Economic Forum. (2025). Future of Jobs Report 2025.
© Tony Frontier, PhD & the AI Center for Effective Teaching & Learning, 2026 · firsteducation-us.com/ai-center